
On September 14th, a16z Crypto General Counsel Miles Jennings, alongside the DeFi Education Fund, submitted a comprehensive proposal to the SEC for regulatory clarity in the proposed 'Innovation Exemption' framework. According to the filing, the firms are seeking regulatory relief for decentralized exchanges (DEXes), applications that access them, and the developers behind them. Jennings stated that such a move would 'extend regulatory clarity to truly permissionless systems', addressing concerns that have been central to the stalled CLARITY Act discussions.
The industry's latest proposal outlines four key criteria for DEXs: non-custodial operation, automated execution, permissionless access, and credible neutrality. As reported by AMBCrypto, the initiative argues that DEXs, which do not hold user funds and operate automatically, differ fundamentally from centralized exchanges and should not be regulated identically. The proposal recommends that DEX frontends should be limited to interface maintenance, security updates, and asset screening based on public standards. This represents a more specific framework than previous requests, focusing on operational characteristics rather than just regulatory status.
Traditional broker-dealers, including Citadel Securities, represented by SIFMA, have already expressed concerns about the SEC's Innovation Exemption proposal. According to AMBCrypto, while SIFMA may support the second a16z request for CTP approval pathways, the group is cautious about the broader exemption relief for DEXes and apps. This opposition highlights the ongoing tension between traditional financial institutions and the crypto industry over regulatory frameworks.
Beyond DEX relief, a16z has proposed a dedicated registration framework for centralized crypto trading platforms, modeled after the 1998 alternative trading system rules. As reported by AMBCrypto, this framework would enable regulated trading of various crypto asset pairs while maintaining the distinction between decentralized and centralized platforms. The proposal aims to clarify regulatory treatment for both decentralized and centralized crypto trading platforms, addressing the gap left by the CFTC's relief for passive software like Phantom.