
Shares of India's state-run lenders have demonstrated strong recovery momentum this month, with the PSU Bank index rising 12.5% from March lows. According to reports from CNBC TV18, individual stocks have shown impressive gains, with Bank of Maharashtra leading at 30% for the month, while other major lenders including Canara Bank, SBI, Bank of Baroda and PNB have gained between 11% to 13% during the same period. Recent market data shows continued strength in PSU banking stocks, reflecting investor confidence in the sector's resilience.
The Reserve Bank of India issued final guidelines for the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) framework on Monday evening, with the new provisions taking effect from April 1, 2027. As reported by CNBC TV18, the framework shifts from incurred loss to forward-looking provisions, implementing a three-stage provisioning model where Stage 1 covers standard assets with 12-month expected loss provisions, Stage 2 includes significant risk increase with lifetime loss provisions, and Stage 3 covers credit-impaired assets with provisions that can reach up to 100% in unsecured exposures.
According to brokerage firm Macquarie, the new guidelines will significantly impact PSU banks through increased provisioning requirements. As reported by CNBC TV18, stage 2 provisioning rises sharply from nearly 40 basis points to 500 basis points, with PSU banks facing potential one-time net worth impact of 5% to 10%. The brokerage also warns that PSU banks may experience a rise of 20 to 25 basis points in their credit costs, while private banks remain relatively insulated due to their well-capitalized status with CET-1 ratio above 13%.
The new guidelines maintain the existing definition of Non-Performing Asset (NPA) at 90 days past due, with a significant change in recognition timing. According to CNBC TV18, NPA recognition must now occur as part of the day-end process on the day the account meets the 90-day overdue criteria, rather than at the end of the month or quarter. The guidelines also mandate that all other exposures to the same borrower must be tagged as NPA if any single credit facility is classified as NPA, representing a stricter approach to NPA classification.